What people say after working through the courses.
A selection of feedback from learners across all three programmes — including both what worked well and what they found difficult.
Back to Home480+
Learners enrolled since 2022
92%
Course completion rate
4.7
Average satisfaction rating
3
Years delivering structured AI education
Learner Feedback
Responses collected from learners after completing each course. Dates shown are from May–June 2025.
Kanya Petcharat
Bangkok · Starter Course
"Before this I'd tried a few free tutorials online but kept getting stuck when the examples diverged from what the tutorial showed. The structure here was different — each week built on the previous one and I always knew what I was supposed to be doing. The feedback on my Week 4 submission pointed out something I'd been doing backwards in loops, which saved me a lot of confusion later."
May 2025
Natthaphon Songkram
Chiang Mai · ML In Practice
"The course covers a lot — I'd done basic Python before but machine learning felt like a different subject. It helped that the exercises were practical from the start rather than working through abstract proofs. My code review in Week 7 was useful, though the turnaround was closer to a week than five days for that one. The portfolio project was the most valuable part — I had something to refer to in later conversations about my background."
April 2025
Siriporn Wattana
Bangkok · Advanced AI Dev
"I came in with a few years of Python and some ML experience. The advanced course pushed me into areas I'd been avoiding — particularly proper evaluation methodology and deployment patterns. The capstone project was challenging; getting the integration working took longer than I expected. The mentor feedback at that stage was detailed enough to be genuinely useful rather than just encouragement."
May 2025
Thanakorn Kritchana
Phuket · Starter Course
"I work full-time and was worried the pacing would be a problem, but the asynchronous format meant I could work through lessons on weekends. Eight weeks felt about right for the content level. The notes were useful — I went back to them during the ML course I did afterwards. I'd have liked slightly more worked examples in the AI section toward the end, but that's minor."
March 2025
Pornpan Lertchai
Khon Kaen · ML In Practice
"The group discussion space was more useful than I expected. Seeing where other people got stuck made me realise some of my questions weren't as unusual as I thought. The pipeline project at the end took me most of the final four weeks, which is probably about right given how much goes into it. The completion record was something I could actually describe to someone who asked about my background."
May 2025
Weerasak Charoenwong
Bangkok · Advanced AI Dev
"Sixteen weeks is a serious commitment and the workload in the middle sections is genuinely heavy. I had to renegotiate my schedule at work to keep up. That said, the depth in the deployment section was something I hadn't found covered this practically elsewhere. The peer review sessions were a bit underused by some cohort members, but when people did engage it added real value."
April 2025
Learner Journeys
Three accounts of what learners brought to the courses, what they worked through and what they took away.
From no coding background to building a data classifier
Starter Course → Machine Learning In Practice · 20 weeks total
Starting point
A marketing analyst with no programming experience who wanted to understand how the AI tools being used around her at work actually functioned — not just how to use them.
The path
Started with the Starter Course over eight weeks, then enrolled in Machine Learning In Practice after a four-week gap. The overlap in Python coverage helped the transition. The ML portfolio project focused on a customer segmentation dataset from her field.
Outcome
Completed both courses and built a working classifier that she documented in her portfolio. She notes the learning was harder than she expected but more tangible than courses she'd tried before.
"I didn't know what a variable was when I started. By the end of the ML course I had a working model I'd built myself. That's not something I'd have believed twelve months earlier."
— Kanya P., Bangkok
Moving from backend development into applied machine learning
Machine Learning In Practice · 12 weeks
Starting point
A backend developer with solid Python who had been reading about machine learning for over a year but hadn't committed to a structured course. Self-study hadn't produced anything he felt confident showing to colleagues.
The path
Enrolled directly in Machine Learning In Practice, skipping the Starter Course as his Python was already solid. The structured exercises gave him a reason to actually write and submit code rather than reading about it. Code review feedback addressed gaps in how he was evaluating models.
Outcome
Finished with a complete ML pipeline as his portfolio project. He noted the course closed the gap between reading about ML and actually knowing how to build something with it. Later enrolled in the Advanced AI programme.
"The code review caught things I'd been doing out of habit that were causing problems I'd been attributing to other causes. Worth it for that alone."
— Natthaphon S., Chiang Mai
Building and deploying a working AI application
Advanced AI Development · 16 weeks
Starting point
An experienced developer who had built several ML models in isolation but hadn't worked through a full deployment cycle. Her models worked in notebooks but she lacked the structure to integrate them reliably into production environments.
The path
Enrolled in the Advanced course. Found the data pipeline sections most challenging — they exposed assumptions she'd been making. The capstone project required integrating a trained model into a simple backend API, which she said was the piece she'd been missing.
Outcome
Completed the capstone project — a functioning AI application with documentation. She noted it took four of the sixteen weeks to finish properly and that the time was warranted. The peer review sessions she found uneven but occasionally very useful.
"I finally understand what I was doing wrong with evaluation — I was measuring the wrong things and getting results that looked fine until they didn't. The course fixed that."
— Siriporn W., Bangkok
Contact Loomgrid
Questions about a course or enrolment? We're available during office hours.
Phone
+66 2 612 38 95Address
51 Pracha Uthit Rd, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140
Office Hours
Mon–Fri 9:00–18:00
Sat 10:00–14:00 ICT
Affiliations & Standards
Thailand EdTech Association
Member since 2023
SEA AI Education Forum
Recognised contributor 2024
Open Source Education Initiative
Signatory since 2023
Ready to begin your own course?
Browse the three programmes or send an enquiry to ask which one suits your background — we'll give you a direct, honest answer.